Claimant v City & Essex Limited

The tribunal found the dismissal was fair after hearing evidence over five days. The judgment states the complaint is not well-founded, indicating the respondent acted within the band of reasonable responses in dismissing the claimant.

The tribunal found the respondent was entitled to dismiss without notice pay. The claim relating to notice pay was not well-founded, suggesting the respondent had lawful grounds for summary dismissal or complied with contractual notice requirements.

The tribunal dismissed the complaints at issues 6.1.3 and 6.1.4 of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability, finding they were not well-founded after considering the evidence.

The complaints at issues 6.1.1 and 6.1.2 relating to unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability were withdrawn by the claimant during the hearing.

The tribunal found no breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments for the claimant's disability. The complaint was not well-founded, suggesting either no PCP was identified, no substantial disadvantage was shown, or adjustments were made or would not have been reasonable.

The tribunal found the victimisation complaint was not well-founded, indicating that either no protected act was established or the respondent's treatment was not because of the protected act.