Cases6015281/2024

Claimant v Cloud Imperium Games Limited

9 April 2025Before Employment Judge K M RossManchesterin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Automatic Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claim was presented outside the time limit in Section 111 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for the claim to be presented within the time limit. The tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and it was struck out.

Direct Discrimination(disability)struck out

The claim was presented outside the time limit in Section 123(1) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and it was struck out.

Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments(disability)struck out

The claim was presented outside the time limit in Section 123(1) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and it was struck out.

Harassment(disability)struck out

The claim for disability related harassment was presented outside the time limit in Section 123(1) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and it was struck out.

Victimisationstruck out

The claim was presented outside the time limit in Section 123(1) Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend time. The tribunal therefore had no jurisdiction to hear the claim and it was struck out.

Facts

The claimant brought claims against his former employer, a video game development company, for automatic unfair dismissal based on whistleblowing (s.103A ERA 1996) and multiple disability discrimination claims including direct discrimination, failure to make reasonable adjustments, harassment, and victimisation. All claims were presented to the tribunal outside the statutory time limits.

Decision

The tribunal struck out all claims for lack of jurisdiction due to being presented out of time. For the automatic unfair dismissal claim, it found it was reasonably practicable for the claimant to have presented the claim within the s.111 ERA time limit. For the Equality Act claims, the tribunal found it was not just and equitable to extend the s.123(1) time limit.

Practical note

Self-represented claimants must adhere strictly to statutory time limits, and tribunals will not extend time for Equality Act claims unless the just and equitable test is satisfied, which requires more than mere oversight or difficulty in bringing claims on time.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Equality Act 2010 s.13Equality Act 2010 s.20Equality Act 2010 s.21Employment Rights Act 1996 s.103AEquality Act 2010 s.27Equality Act 2010 s.123(1)Equality Act 2010 s.26Employment Rights Act 1996 s.111

Case details

Case number
6015281/2024
Decision date
9 April 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No