Cases2302162/2023

Claimant v SE8 London Limited

9 April 2025Before Employment Judge YardleyLondon Southremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£1,078

Individual claims

Holiday Paysucceeded

The Respondent accepted that holiday pay was owing. The Tribunal calculated that the Claimant was entitled to 5.49 weeks of paid holiday based on 51 out of 52 weeks worked in his holiday year. The total accrued holiday pay was £899.93, less £149.87 already paid, leaving a balance of £750.06 owed to the Claimant.

Othersucceeded

The Respondent admitted that no written statement of employment particulars had been provided throughout the Claimant's 12-month employment. The Tribunal found this was a breach of the Claimant's statutory right under section 1 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, regardless of the Claimant's casual status. An award of 2 weeks' pay was made under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002.

Facts

The Claimant worked as a barista for approximately 12 months from December 2021 to December 2022 on variable hours, paid £9.50 per hour. He was never provided with a written contract or statement of employment particulars. He did not take any annual leave during his employment and received only £149.87 in respect of accrued holiday pay on termination. The café business has since closed.

Decision

The Tribunal found that the Claimant was entitled to £750.06 in outstanding holiday pay, calculated based on 5.49 weeks of accrued entitlement at an average weekly gross pay of £163.92. The Tribunal also awarded 2 weeks' pay (£327.84) for the Respondent's failure to provide a written statement of employment particulars, finding that the Claimant's casual status did not justify this statutory breach.

Practical note

Even for casual workers with variable hours, employers must provide written statements of employment particulars and properly calculate and pay accrued holiday entitlement on termination, with awards now mandatory for non-compliance with section 1 ERA 1996.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£750

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Act 2002 s.38Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13Employment Rights Act 1996 ss.221-224Working Time Regulations 1998 reg 13AWorking Time Regulations 1998 reg 14Employment Rights Act 1996 s.1

Case details

Case number
2302162/2023
Decision date
9 April 2025
Hearing type
remedy
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
barista
Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor