Cases4107949/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

4 April 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order dated 18 February 2025 requiring written reasons by 4 March 2025 or a request for hearing to show cause why claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mr D Doyle brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Community Safety Glasgow. The claim was filed in 2019. On 18 February 2025, the Tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 4 March 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

Employment Judge Frances Eccles struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's unless order or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must comply with tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims or face strike-out for non-pursuit under rule 38.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4107949/2019
Decision date
4 April 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No