Claimant v Penrose Homes Limited

The tribunal found that the claimant was not an employee of the respondent at any time, meaning the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear an unfair dismissal claim. Additionally, even if she had been an employee, she did not have the required two years' continuous employment.

The tribunal determined that this claim had no reasonable prospects of success and dismissed it on that basis. The tribunal gave oral reasons at the hearing but the judgment does not detail the specific reasoning.

The tribunal found that this claim had no reasonable prospects of success and dismissed it. The specific reasoning was provided orally at the hearing but is not detailed in the written judgment.

The tribunal determined that this claim had no reasonable prospects of success and dismissed it on that basis. The specific reasoning for this conclusion was given orally at the hearing.