Cases4100548/2020

Claimant v Barchester Healthcare Limited

2 April 2025Before Employment Judge J M HendryScotlandremote video

Outcome

Other

Facts

This was a preliminary hearing concerning the claimant's application to strike out the respondent's defence for breach of a tribunal order. The respondent had been ordered to provide documents two weeks before the hearing (by 12 January 2021) but sent them on 15 January, four days late. The claimant's solicitor had withdrawn on 18 January, leaving the claimant represented by his wife. The claimant applied to strike out the respondent's response for non-compliance with the order.

Decision

The tribunal refused the strike-out application, finding it wholly disproportionate. The default was minor (only four days late), the majority of documents had already been seen by the claimant, and there was no real prejudice as the full hearing was postponed and would be relisted months later, giving the claimant ample time to consider the documents.

Practical note

Strike-out for procedural breaches must be proportionate; minor delays in document disclosure causing no real prejudice will not justify striking out a party's case when less drastic remedies are available.

Legal authorities cited

Blockbuster Entertainment Ltd v James [2006] IRLR 630Ridsdill & Ors v D Smith & Nephew Medical & Ors EAT 0704/05

Statutes

Rule 37(1)(c)Rule 37(1)(b)

Case details

Case number
4100548/2020
Decision date
2 April 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No