Cases1305066/2023

Claimant v iForce Limited

2 April 2025Before Employment Judge KenwardBirmingham

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the dismissal did not breach Employment Rights Act 1996 sections 98 and 111. The complaint was not well-founded and the tribunal concluded the dismissal was fair.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The claim was for discrimination by association under Equality Act 2010 section 13. The tribunal found no evidence of direct discrimination on the basis of association with a disabled person and dismissed the complaint as not well-founded.

Facts

Mr Shaer brought claims against his former employer iForce Limited for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination by association. He represented himself at a three-day hearing in Birmingham before a full tribunal panel. The respondent was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims, finding that the dismissal was fair under the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that there was no evidence of direct disability discrimination by association under the Equality Act 2010. The claimant's complaints were not well-founded.

Practical note

A claim for discrimination by association with a disabled person under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010 requires evidence linking the alleged treatment to that association, which was not established in this case.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98ERA 1996 s.111EqA 2010 s.13

Case details

Case number
1305066/2023
Decision date
2 April 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
3
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No