Claimant v Wincanton Group Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under Employment Tribunal Rule 38(1)(d) because the claimant failed to attend the hearing and did not actively pursue the claim.
Facts
Mr N Chaudhary brought a claim against three Wincanton entities. The case was listed for a preliminary hearing on 1 April 2025. The claimant failed to attend the hearing and was not represented. The respondent was represented by counsel, Ms Zielinska.
Decision
Employment Judge Fearon struck out the claimant's claim under Rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Rules because the claim had not been actively pursued by the claimant, evidenced by his non-attendance at the hearing.
Practical note
A claim will be struck out for non-pursuit where a claimant fails to attend a scheduled hearing without explanation or engagement with the tribunal.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6004234/2024
- Decision date
- 1 April 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- logistics
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No