Cases3304202/2024

Claimant v Mach Recruitment Limited

31 March 2025Before Employment Judge AnstisMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-compliance with Tribunal Order dated 5th December 2024 and failure to actively pursue the claim. Claimant failed to make representations or request a hearing following notice from the Tribunal.

Facts

Mr Musil brought a claim against Mach Recruitment Ltd. The Tribunal issued an Order on 5th December 2024 which the claimant failed to comply with. On 12th February 2025, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for non-compliance and failure to actively pursue. The claimant did not respond.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim on the papers because the claimant failed to comply with the previous Order, failed to actively pursue the claim, and did not respond to the Tribunal's notice providing an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must comply with Tribunal orders and actively pursue their claims or risk strike-out, even without a hearing if they fail to respond to opportunities to make representations.

Case details

Case number
3304202/2024
Decision date
31 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No