Claimant v We Love Dogs Rossendale Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The respondent failed to present a valid response on time to the claim. The tribunal determined under rule 22 that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £393.60.
Facts
The claimant brought a claim against We Love Dogs Rossendale Ltd alleging unauthorised deduction from wages. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time to the claim.
Decision
The tribunal determined the claim under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2024 as the respondent had failed to respond. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £393.60 gross.
Practical note
Default judgments under rule 22 can be obtained where a respondent fails to present a valid response on time, even for relatively small sums.
Award breakdown
Case details
- Case number
- 2407044/2024
- Decision date
- 31 March 2025
- Hearing type
- rule 21
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No