Cases6002879/2024

Claimant v Clear Education Limited

31 March 2025Before Employment Judge MaidmentLeedsremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£896

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The claimant was awarded £261.20 in unpaid wages up to 13 February 2024, indicating the tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that wages were unlawfully withheld.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the claimant had accrued but untaken holiday entitlement at the termination of employment on 13 February 2024. The respondent was ordered to pay £634.62 representing this accrued holiday pay, showing the tribunal accepted the claimant's calculations and entitlement.

Breach of Contractfailed

The claimant's claim seeking damages for breach of contract was dismissed by the tribunal. The tribunal either found no breach occurred or that the claimant failed to prove the alleged breach on the balance of probabilities.

Facts

Mr Thorpe worked for Clear Education Limited, an education sector company. His employment terminated on 13 February 2024. He brought claims for unlawful deduction of wages, unpaid holiday pay, and breach of contract. The respondent also brought a counterclaim which was withdrawn at the hearing.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on the unauthorised deductions claim, awarding £261.20 in unpaid wages. The tribunal also awarded £634.62 for accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. However, the breach of contract claim was dismissed. The respondent's counterclaim was withdrawn and dismissed.

Practical note

Even where an employee succeeds on wages and holiday pay claims, additional breach of contract claims may still fail if not properly evidenced or proven.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£635
Unpaid wages£261

Case details

Case number
6002879/2024
Decision date
31 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
No
Rep type
self

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep