Claimant v Cordia Services LLP
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). Claimant's solicitors withdrew, claimant failed to respond to Tribunal status enquiry, correspondence returned undelivered as claimant no longer at registered address, and claimant failed to notify Tribunal of new address.
Facts
The claimant brought proceedings against two respondents but her solicitors subsequently withdrew from acting. The Tribunal sent a status enquiry letter which went unanswered, followed by a strike out warning letter on 19 February 2025. All correspondence was returned undelivered as the claimant had moved without notifying the Tribunal of her new address.
Decision
The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit, assuming the claimant no longer wished to proceed given her failure to maintain contact with the Tribunal and provide an updated address.
Practical note
Claimants must keep the Tribunal informed of their current contact details and respond to correspondence, or risk their claim being struck out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4111338/2018
- Decision date
- 28 March 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No