Cases4104543/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

27 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) after claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing following the tribunal's opportunity given on 14 January 2025. The claimant did not respond by the deadline of 28 January 2025.

Facts

The claimant brought proceedings against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. On 14 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 28 January 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons by the deadline.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 due to the claimant's failure to engage with the tribunal's process. The claimant did not provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing within the specified timeframe.

Practical note

A claimant must respond to tribunal directions to show cause against strike-out or their claim will be struck out for non-pursuit without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4104543/2019
Decision date
27 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No