Cases4104366/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

27 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal order dated 14 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 28 January 2025 or request for hearing as to why claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Mrs Baird brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. On 14 January 2025, the tribunal issued an order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 28 January 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that it had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing in response to the tribunal's earlier order.

Practical note

Tribunals will strike out claims for non-pursuit where claimants fail to respond to unless orders, even without a hearing if no response or hearing request is made.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4104366/2019
Decision date
27 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No