Cases104746/2011

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

27 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's opportunity to give reasons or request a hearing by the 5 February 2025 deadline, demonstrating non-pursuit of the claim.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council in 2011. On 22 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 5 February 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond by the deadline.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued, as the claimant failed to give acceptable reasons or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to do so.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal directions and deadlines or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit, even in long-running cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
104746/2011
Decision date
27 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No