Cases117466/2010

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

25 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given until 27 January 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to give an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

This is a procedural strike-out case. The claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life in 2010. On 13 January 2025, the Tribunal issued an unless order giving the claimant until 27 January 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or comply with this order.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing.

Practical note

A claimant who fails to respond to an unless order or demonstrate active pursuit of their claim risks having it struck out, even if the claim has been ongoing for many years.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
117466/2010
Decision date
25 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No