Claimant v Cordia Services LLP
Outcome
Individual claims
The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued. The claimant was given until 7 March 2025 to provide reasons or request a hearing but failed to do so or provide an acceptable reason.
Facts
Ms E Spiers brought a claim against Cordia Services LLP and Glasgow City Council. On 21 February 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 7 March 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit, or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or provide an acceptable reason.
Decision
The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond but failed to do so.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions; failure to do so will result in strike-out under rule 38(1)(d).
Case details
- Case number
- 4111375/2018
- Decision date
- 25 March 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No