Cases116242/2010

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

24 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order dated 10 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 24 January 2025 or request for hearing.

Facts

Claimant Ms E Watt brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life. The tribunal issued an unless order on 10 January 2025 requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 24 January 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Practical note

Failure to comply with an unless order requiring a claimant to show cause why a claim should not be struck out will result in automatic strike out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
116242/2010
Decision date
24 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No