Cases4101374/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

24 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to provide written reasons or request a hearing by the deadline of 10 March 2025 following the tribunal's notice of 24 February 2025.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life in 2019. On 24 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 10 March 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim has not been actively pursued. The claimant's failure to respond to the tribunal's notice constituted a failure to actively pursue the claim.

Practical note

Claimants must actively engage with tribunal procedures and respond to judicial directions, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4101374/2019
Decision date
24 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No