Cases4114329/2018

Claimant v Cordia Services LLP

24 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's opportunity given on 24 February 2025 to provide written reasons by 10 March 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Ms Druggan brought a claim against Cordia Services LLP and Glasgow City Council in 2018. The claim was not actively pursued. On 24 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant until 10 March 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason against strike out or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4114329/2018
Decision date
24 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No