Cases4107885/2012

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

24 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue. Claimant failed to provide written reasons by 24 January 2025 or request a hearing after being given the opportunity to show cause why the claim should not be struck out.

Facts

Claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Glasgow Life in 2012. On 10 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 24 January 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or provide acceptable reasons.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued, following the claimant's failure to respond to the unless order.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal directions, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit even in long-standing cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4107885/2012
Decision date
24 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No