Cases6007638/2024

Claimant v Sedgemoor Community Transport

21 March 2025Before Employment Judge SangerBristolremote video

Outcome

Default judgment£5,273

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,320 for unfair dismissal. This was a default judgment made under Rule 22 due to the respondent's failure to appear and defend the claim.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £953.47 net. This was decided as part of the default judgment when the respondent failed to participate.

Facts

Mr Batterbee brought claims for unfair dismissal and unlawful deduction of wages against Sedgemoor Community Transport. The respondent failed to appear at the hearing. The tribunal proceeded to consider the claims in the respondent's absence under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

Decision

The tribunal found in favour of the claimant on both claims as the respondent did not appear to defend. The claimant was awarded a basic award of £4,320 for unfair dismissal and £953.47 net for unlawful deduction of wages, with the respondent responsible for tax and National Insurance.

Practical note

Employers who fail to respond or appear at tribunal hearings risk default judgments being entered against them for the full amounts claimed.

Award breakdown

Basic award£4,320
Unpaid wages£953

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 - Rule 22

Case details

Case number
6007638/2024
Decision date
21 March 2025
Hearing type
default judgment
Hearing days
1
Classification
default

Respondent

Sector
transport
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No