Claimant v Computershare Services Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The first flexible working request in November 2021 was invalid as claimant had not worked the required 26 weeks. The second request from January 2022 was withdrawn after informal discussion and was substantially out of time. The third request from July 2022 was granted in full. No valid claim exists.
The claim succeeded regarding the failure to provide appropriate Bluetooth headphones for the claimant's otitis media condition from March 2023 until end of employment. Despite accepting the need, the Respondent failed to provide suitable equipment due to bureaucratic processes. Other reasonable adjustment claims regarding shift patterns and office attendance failed.
The section 15 discrimination arising from disability claim failed. The claimant was not treated unfavourably because of her absence record (no formal disciplinary action taken), inability to achieve targets (proposal to increase targets would not have disadvantaged her), or inability to use headsets (this was addressed through the reasonable adjustments claim).
The claimant failed to establish fundamental breach of contract. The tribunal found no breach regarding shift patterns as she had agreed to work until 8pm from July 2022. While there was a failure to provide headphones, this did not evince an intention not to be bound by contract terms. The resignation was primarily triggered by failure to secure a paralegal position, not any breach by the respondent.
Facts
The claimant was a home-working shift worker who disclosed ulcerative colitis and was later found to have multiple disabilities including otitis media, osteoarthritis and bipolar disorder (undisclosed). From March 2023 she requested alternative Bluetooth headphones due to ear infections caused by standard equipment. Despite accepting the need, the respondent failed to provide suitable headphones due to bureaucratic processes requiring medical evidence and multiple authorisations. The claimant made several flexible working requests which were either invalid, withdrawn, or granted. She resigned in February 2024 primarily after failing to secure an internal paralegal position.
Decision
The tribunal found the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments by not providing appropriate Bluetooth headphones from March 2023 to end of employment, awarding £10,000 injury to feelings plus interest. All other claims failed including flexible working complaints (out of time or granted), reasonable adjustments regarding shifts (claimant had agreed to work pattern), section 15 discrimination (no unfavourable treatment established), and constructive dismissal (no fundamental breach, resignation motivated by failure to secure alternative role).
Practical note
Employers must act promptly on reasonable adjustment requests even when the disabled employee has their own workaround; bureaucratic internal processes do not excuse prolonged failure to provide auxiliary aids, though the tribunal will consider whether the employer demonstrated continuing intention to comply when assessing injury to feelings.
Award breakdown
Vento band: lower
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 1801933/2024
- Decision date
- 21 March 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- financial services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No