Claimant v Cordia Services LLP
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d). The claimant was given until 3 March 2025 to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.
Facts
Ms Laird brought claims against Cordia Services LLP and Glasgow City Council. On 17 February 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant until 3 March 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond adequately or request a hearing.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide reasons or request a hearing but failed to do so acceptably.
Practical note
Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal unless orders, or face strike-out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4106922/2018
- Decision date
- 20 March 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No