Cases4104516/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

19 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d) after claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order dated 13 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 27 January 2025 or to request a hearing.

Facts

Mrs Lynch brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. On 13 January 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 27 January 2025 or request a hearing to show why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for non-pursuit. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing following the unless order.

Practical note

Failure to comply with an unless order will result in a claim being struck out for non-pursuit, even without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4104516/2019
Decision date
19 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No