Claimant v Glasgow City Council
Outcome
Individual claims
Claim struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for non-pursuit. Claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order dated 13 February 2025 requiring written reasons or request for hearing by 27 February 2025.
Facts
Mr McCrae brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Community Safety Glasgow. On 13 February 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 27 February 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to respond or comply with this order.
Decision
The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing in response to the unless order.
Practical note
Claimants must respond to tribunal unless orders or risk strike-out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d).
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 4105041/2017
- Decision date
- 19 March 2025
- Hearing type
- strike out
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- procedural
Respondent
- Name
- Glasgow City Council
- Sector
- local government
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No