Cases3302492/2024

Claimant v Royal Mail Group Limited

18 March 2025Before Employment Judge LaidlerBury St Edmundsin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant was fairly dismissed by reason of conduct, which is a potentially fair reason under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent followed a fair procedure and dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses available to a reasonable employer in the circumstances.

Facts

Mr Sanders was employed by Royal Mail Group Limited and was dismissed for misconduct. The specific details of the conduct that led to dismissal are not provided in this judgment, but the dismissal was contested by the claimant. The hearing took place over two days in March 2025 to determine whether the dismissal was fair.

Decision

The tribunal found that the dismissal was fair and for a potentially fair reason under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, namely conduct. The claim for unfair dismissal was therefore dismissed.

Practical note

Royal Mail Group Limited successfully defended an unfair dismissal claim by demonstrating that the dismissal for conduct was both substantively and procedurally fair under the statutory test.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.98

Case details

Case number
3302492/2024
Decision date
18 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
logistics
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Claimant representation

Represented
No