Cases1304267/2024

Claimant v Telent Technology Services Limited

17 March 2025Before Employment Judge K WrightBirminghamremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£5,127

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the dismissal was procedurally and/or substantively unfair. However, the tribunal applied a 60% Polkey reduction, indicating that while the dismissal was unfair, there was a significant chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed following a proper procedure.

Facts

The claimant was dismissed by Telent Technology Services Limited on 16 February 2024. The claimant brought an unfair dismissal claim. The hearing took place remotely over two days in February 2025. The claimant was represented by his father as a lay representative, while the respondent was represented by counsel.

Decision

The tribunal found the dismissal was unfair. However, it applied a substantial 60% Polkey reduction, finding there was a 60% chance the claimant would have been fairly dismissed anyway if a proper procedure had been followed. The compensatory award after adjustments was £5,126.57, with recoupment provisions applying.

Practical note

Even where a dismissal is found to be unfair, tribunals can significantly reduce compensation through Polkey reductions where the evidence shows a high probability that a fair dismissal would have occurred following proper procedure.

Award breakdown

Compensatory award£5,127
Loss of statutory rights£200

Adjustments

Polkey reduction60%

60% chance that the claimant would have been fairly dismissed in any event

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
1304267/2024
Decision date
17 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep