Claimant v G & K Cothliff Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment. This was determined under Rule 22 procedure, likely indicating the respondent did not respond to the claim.
Facts
Mr Williamson brought a claim against G & K Cothliff Limited. The respondent failed to respond to the claim or participate in proceedings. The tribunal determined under Rule 22 that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. Other complaints in the case remain outstanding and are scheduled for hearing.
Decision
The tribunal made a default judgment under Rule 22 ordering the respondent to pay £119.60 in unpaid holiday pay. The claimant's remaining complaints will proceed to a full hearing scheduled for 27 May 2025.
Practical note
Rule 22 allows tribunals to make determinations on parts of claims where respondents fail to engage, enabling partial resolution while other matters proceed to full hearing.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 6001245/2025
- Decision date
- 17 March 2025
- Hearing type
- default judgment
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- other
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No