Cases1400404/2023

Claimant v Paragon Staff Limited

16 March 2025Before Employment Judge A. TinnionExeterremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£21,469

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found that the respondent summarily dismissed the claimant on 20 October 2022 without warning or procedure, in breach of sections 94-98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The respondent's failure to follow any fair dismissal process rendered the dismissal unfair.

Holiday Payfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant's holiday pay claim was not well founded and dismissed it. No further details provided in the judgment.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant's claim for arrears of pay was not well founded and dismissed it. No further details provided in the judgment.

Facts

The claimant Mr Brian Johnson was employed by Paragon Staff Ltd. On 20 October 2022, the respondent summarily dismissed the claimant without any warning or following any disciplinary procedure. The claimant brought claims for unfair dismissal, holiday pay, and arrears of pay. The respondent did not attend the final hearing.

Decision

The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim succeeded because the respondent dismissed the claimant without warning or procedure. The tribunal dismissed the holiday pay and arrears of pay claims as not well founded. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £3,426 and a compensatory award increased by 20% for failure to follow the ACAS Code, totalling £21,469.22.

Practical note

Summary dismissal without any disciplinary procedure will result in a finding of unfair dismissal and attract a 20% ACAS uplift for failure to follow proper procedures.

Award breakdown

Basic award£3,426
Compensatory award£18,043

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+20%

Respondent's unreasonable failure to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures. The respondent summarily dismissed the claimant without warning or procedure.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 ss.94-98Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.207A(2)

Case details

Case number
1400404/2023
Decision date
16 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
professional services
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No