Cases6022264/2024

Claimant v CloudSource Ltd

14 March 2025Before Employment Judge L SarkisLondon Centralremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£2,180

Individual claims

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found the respondent was justified in requiring the claimant to take 3-6 September 2024 as annual leave because the claimant was in France working remotely without permission, contrary to the respondent's clear policy prohibiting working from outside the UK. The claimant was aware of this policy and had not obtained authorisation.

Holiday Paysucceeded

The respondent unlawfully required the claimant to take 10 days as annual leave between 9-20 September 2024 without giving the required notice under the Working Time Regulations 1998, which mandates twice as many days' notice as the leave period. The respondent gave no notice at all, making the requirement unlawful and entitling the claimant to payment for 10 days of accrued but untaken holiday.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found the deduction for the access pass (£25) and portable monitor (£233.10) was authorised under the employment contract. The claimant admitted she did not return these items and the tribunal found she knew she could have returned them to the office despite her claims otherwise.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found on the balance of probabilities that the claimant had never been provided with a Kensington dock and that she had already returned the headset prior to resigning. The deduction of £256.86 for these items was therefore unauthorised as the respondent provided no documentary evidence to support that these items were in the claimant's possession.

Facts

The claimant, a junior project manager earning £4,166.67 gross per month, resigned on 14 August 2024 with a 3-month notice period. She travelled to France between 3-6 September 2024 without permission to work remotely. The respondent required her to take these days and a further 10 days (9-20 September) as annual leave, then terminated her notice period early on 20 September 2024. The respondent deducted holiday pay for 14 days and £509.96 for unreturned office equipment from her final payment.

Decision

The tribunal found the deduction for 3-6 September annual leave was lawful as the claimant worked abroad without permission, but the deduction for 9-20 September was unlawful as the respondent failed to give the required notice under the Working Time Regulations. The equipment deduction was partly lawful (access pass and monitor not returned) but partly unlawful (Kensington dock never issued, headset already returned). The claimant was awarded £2,179.86 comprising £1,923 for 10 days' holiday pay and £256.86 for wrongly deducted equipment costs.

Practical note

Employers must comply with the Working Time Regulations notice requirements when requiring employees to take annual leave during their notice period, and cannot simply impose leave without the required advance notice even where the contract permits them to require leave to be taken.

Award breakdown

Holiday pay£1,923
Unpaid wages£257

Award equivalent: 2.3 weeks' gross pay

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13(3)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.14Employment Rights Act 1996 Part IIWorking Time Regulations 1998 s.15Employment Rights Act 1996 s.27Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13Employment Rights Act 1996 s.13(1)

Case details

Case number
6022264/2024
Decision date
14 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
junior project manager
Salary band
£50,000–£60,000

Claimant representation

Represented
No