Claimant v Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence and submissions on the claimant's complaint that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages. After considering all the evidence, the tribunal found that the complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it.
Facts
Mr Ahmed brought a claim against Carlisle Support Services Group Ltd alleging unauthorised deductions from wages. The case was heard remotely via CVP before Employment Judge Bann. Mr Ahmed represented himself while the respondent was represented by a solicitor, Ms Younis.
Decision
The tribunal heard oral evidence and submissions from both parties. After considering all the evidence, the tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was not well-founded and dismissed the claim.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant's wage deduction claim failed on the merits after a one-day remote hearing where the respondent successfully defended with legal representation.
Case details
- Case number
- 6015743/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- professional services
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- solicitor
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No