Cases6021471/2024

Claimant v Sans Pareil Clothing Limited

14 March 2025Before Employment Judge DunlopManchesterremote video

Outcome

Partly successful£9,432

Individual claims

Wrongful Dismissalfailed

The claim for wrongful dismissal (notice pay) failed because the tribunal found the claimant was a worker but not an employee. Wrongful dismissal claims require employee status.

Redundancy Payfailed

The claim for a redundancy payment failed because the tribunal found the claimant was a worker but not an employee. Statutory redundancy pay requires employee status.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagessucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. The respondent failed to pay the claimant nine months' wages at £1,048.00 per month, totalling £9,432.00.

Facts

The claimant, Mr Bamber, brought claims against Sans Pareil Clothing Limited for wrongful dismissal, redundancy pay, and unauthorised deductions from wages. The respondent did not participate in the hearing. The tribunal determined that the claimant was a worker but not an employee of the respondent. The claimant had not been paid nine months' wages at £1,048.00 per month.

Decision

The tribunal found that the claimant's wrongful dismissal and redundancy pay claims failed because he was a worker, not an employee. However, his claim for unauthorised deductions from wages succeeded. The tribunal extended time for the wage claim and ordered the respondent to pay £9,432.00 representing nine months' unpaid wages.

Practical note

Worker status is sufficient for wage claims but not for wrongful dismissal or statutory redundancy pay, which require employee status.

Award breakdown

Unpaid wages£9,432

Legal authorities cited

Case details

Case number
6021471/2024
Decision date
14 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
retail
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No