Cases4123701/2018

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

11 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit. The claimant was given until 29 May 2024 to provide written reasons or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out, but failed to respond or provide an acceptable reason.

Facts

Mr P Slater brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. The claim was filed in 2018 but was not actively pursued. On 8 May 2024, the tribunal gave the claimant until 29 May 2024 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue it. The claimant was given a clear opportunity to provide reasons or request a hearing but failed to do so or provide an acceptable reason.

Practical note

A claimant must actively engage with the tribunal process; failure to respond to unless orders providing an opportunity to explain non-pursuit will result in strike out.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 Schedule 1 Rule 37Rule 37(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4123701/2018
Decision date
11 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No