Cases2600726/2023

Claimant v Qube Learning and Development

11 March 2025Before Employment Judge Victoria ButlerMidlands Easton papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Redundancy Paystruck out

The claimant was employed for less than two years and therefore did not meet the statutory qualifying period under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 for entitlement to a redundancy payment. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim for a redundancy payment following her employment with Qube Learning and Development. Her employment lasted less than two years. The claimant was given an opportunity to explain why her claim should not be struck out but did not provide an acceptable reason. The judgment notes that other complaints brought by the claimant remain unaffected.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim for redundancy payment because the claimant lacked the necessary two years' continuous employment required under section 155 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant's other complaints were not affected by this decision.

Practical note

Claims for statutory redundancy payments will be struck out where the employee does not meet the two-year qualifying service requirement, regardless of the merits of any redundancy.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.155

Case details

Case number
2600726/2023
Decision date
11 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No