Claimant v Synnovis Analytics LLP
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over two days and concluded that the claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded. The reasons were given orally at the hearing. The claimant did not succeed in proving that the dismissal was unfair.
Facts
Ms Celik brought an unfair dismissal claim against Synnovis Analytics LLP. The case was heard over two days by video at London South Employment Tribunal. The claimant was represented by a lay representative, while the respondent was represented by counsel. The tribunal heard evidence and oral submissions from both parties.
Decision
Employment Judge D Wright sitting alone dismissed the unfair dismissal claim, finding it was not well founded. The tribunal gave detailed oral reasons at the hearing explaining why the dismissal was not unfair. No written reasons were provided as none were requested at the hearing.
Practical note
Even with lay representation, a claimant must prove on the facts that their dismissal was unfair, and the tribunal found this was not established in this case.
Case details
- Case number
- 2303999/2023
- Decision date
- 11 March 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 2
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- healthcare
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- lay rep