Cases6000051/2024

Claimant v Honest Gill's Catering Company Limited

11 March 2025Before Employment Judge Ian MillerHullin person

Outcome

Partly successful£3,561

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalsucceeded

The tribunal found the complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015, warranting a 25% uplift to the compensatory award.

Direct Discrimination(disability)failed

The tribunal concluded that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well-founded and dismissed this claim.

Facts

Ms Ireland was employed by Honest Gill's Catering Company Limited until her dismissal on 2 December 2023. She brought claims of unfair dismissal and direct disability discrimination. The respondent failed to provide written employment particulars and failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary procedures.

Decision

The tribunal upheld the unfair dismissal claim, finding the respondent had unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code, warranting a 25% uplift to compensation. The disability discrimination claim was dismissed. Awards included basic and compensatory awards plus an additional two weeks' pay for failure to provide written particulars.

Practical note

Failure to follow the ACAS Code on disciplinary procedures can result in significant uplifts to compensation, and employers must provide written employment particulars to avoid additional penalties.

Award breakdown

Basic award£352
Compensatory award£2,857

Adjustments

ACAS uplift+25%

Respondent unreasonably failed to comply with the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures 2015

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Trade Union & Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 s.207AEmployment Act 2002 s.38Employment Protection (Recoupment of Benefits) Regulations 1996

Case details

Case number
6000051/2024
Decision date
11 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
hospitality
Represented
Yes
Rep type
lay rep

Employment details

Claimant representation

Represented
No