Cases4117175/2018

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

10 March 2025Before Employment Judge Frances EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue the claim. The claimant was given an opportunity until 31 January 2025 to provide written reasons or request a hearing but failed to provide an acceptable reason or request a hearing.

Facts

Mrs M Balfour brought a claim against Glasgow City Council and Cordia (Services) LLP. The claim was filed in 2018. On 17 January 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant until 31 January 2025 to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing. The claimant failed to respond or request a hearing.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out or to request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively pursue their claims and respond to tribunal orders, or risk having their claims struck out for non-pursuit regardless of the underlying merits.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4117175/2018
Decision date
10 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No