Cases6001835/2024

Claimant v Barchester Healthcare Limited

10 March 2025Before Employment Judge JM WadeHullin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Working Time Regulationsdismissed on withdrawal

Claim dismissed under Rule 47 due to claimant's failure to attend or be represented at the scheduled preliminary hearing. The claimant had not responded to multiple attempts by respondent's solicitors to contact her, failed to comply with tribunal orders, and did not request a postponement.

Detrimentdismissed on withdrawal

Claim of detriment under Section 45A(f) ERA 1996 dismissed under Rule 47 due to claimant's non-attendance at hearing. The tribunal found it appeared likely the claimant had abandoned her claims given her lack of response to all communications and non-compliance with orders.

Facts

The claimant was 17 when she started working as a kitchen assistant for Barchester Healthcare in 2022. Between autumn 2022 and May 2023, she worked some shifts exceeding eight hours, which is prohibited for under-18s. She raised this issue and her duties were adjusted. Her employment ended in 2023. Approximately 15 months later, she contacted ACAS and filed a claim for breach of Working Time Regulations and detriment. The respondent argued the claims were significantly out of time.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed both claims under Rule 47 due to the claimant's failure to attend the preliminary hearing. The claimant had not responded to multiple contact attempts by the respondent's solicitors or the tribunal, failed to comply with case management orders, and made no postponement application. The judge acknowledged the claimant's young age and health might have been relevant to the time limit issue, but concluded it appeared she had abandoned her claims and it was not fair to leave the respondent in uncertainty.

Practical note

Even where a claimant's personal circumstances (youth, health) might assist with difficult time limit issues, complete non-engagement with the tribunal process will result in dismissal under Rule 47, with the option to apply for reconsideration only if there is a very good reason for the failure to attend.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Working Time Regulations regulation 5(A)(1)(a)Employment Rights Act 1996 s.45A(f)

Case details

Case number
6001835/2024
Decision date
10 March 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
solicitor

Employment details

Role
kitchen assistant
Service
1 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No