Claimant v Hotter Shoes Limited
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal heard evidence over four days and found that the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The complaint was not well-founded and was dismissed.
Facts
Mrs Sarah Davies brought a claim against her employer Hotter Shoes Limited alleging unauthorised deductions from her wages. The case was heard over four days in March 2025 at Manchester Employment Tribunal before Employment Judge Cookson. Both parties were represented by counsel.
Decision
The tribunal found that the respondent had not made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The complaint was dismissed as not well-founded. Oral reasons were given at the hearing.
Practical note
The tribunal found no unauthorised deductions were made from the claimant's wages after hearing full evidence and submissions from both parties.
Case details
- Case number
- 2411693/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 4
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- retail
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister
Claimant representation
- Represented
- Yes
- Rep type
- barrister