Claimant v Prestige Telecom Group Ltd
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded. The claim was dismissed following a hearing where both parties appeared and the tribunal heard oral evidence and submissions.
Facts
Sophie Allison brought a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages against her former employer Prestige Telecom Group Ltd. The case was heard remotely via CVP at Bristol Employment Tribunal. Both parties appeared in person without legal representation, with Mr C Mackett representing the respondent company.
Decision
Employment Judge Sanger heard oral evidence and submissions from both parties and found that the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not well-founded. The claim was dismissed in its entirety. Reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Practical note
A self-represented claimant's wages claim failed on the merits after a CVP hearing where the tribunal found the complaint was not well-founded.
Case details
- Case number
- 1401469/2024
- Decision date
- 7 March 2025
- Hearing type
- full merits
- Hearing days
- 1
- Classification
- contested
Respondent
- Sector
- telecoms
- Represented
- No
- Rep type
- in house
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No