Cases6008963/2024

Claimant v Norbar Torque Tools Limited

7 March 2025Before Employment Judge Andrew Clarke KCWatfordremote video

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalwithdrawn

The claimant withdrew her unfair dismissal claim under Part X of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal dismissed the claim on withdrawal.

Discrimination Arising from Disability (s.15)(disability)failed

The tribunal found that the claimant was not a disabled person within the meaning of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times. Without meeting the threshold definition of disability, the claims for disability discrimination could not succeed.

Unlawful Deduction from Wagesfailed

The tribunal found that the claimant's employment terminated on 24 July 2024 and she was paid the amounts to which she was entitled. Her claim for sick pay had no reasonable prospect of success.

Facts

The claimant, Mrs Trytko, brought claims against her former employer Norbar Torque Tools Limited for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination. Her employment ended on 24 July 2024. She also claimed she had not been paid the sick pay to which she was entitled. This was a preliminary hearing to determine jurisdictional and preliminary issues.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim on withdrawal by the claimant. The disability discrimination claims were dismissed because the tribunal found the claimant did not meet the definition of a disabled person under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The sick pay claim was dismissed as having no reasonable prospect of success, as the claimant had been paid all amounts to which she was entitled.

Practical note

A claimant must satisfy the statutory definition of disability under section 6 of the Equality Act 2010 as a threshold issue before any disability discrimination claims can proceed.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 Part XEquality Act 2010 s.6

Case details

Case number
6008963/2024
Decision date
7 March 2025
Hearing type
preliminary
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
manufacturing
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Claimant representation

Represented
No