Cases2306615/2024

Claimant v Webhelp

6 March 2025Before Employment Judge Burgeon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Unfair Dismissalstruck out

The claimant did not have the requisite two years' service required by s.108 Employment Rights Act 1996 to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant was given an opportunity to provide reasons why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Facts

The claimant P Codner was employed by Webhelp for less than two years and brought two claims of unfair dismissal. On 3 September 2024, the tribunal wrote to the claimant giving an opportunity to explain why the claims should not be struck out due to insufficient qualifying service. The claimant failed to provide an acceptable reason.

Decision

The tribunal struck out both unfair dismissal claims because the claimant did not have the minimum two years' continuous service required by section 108 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant was given an opportunity to respond but failed to provide an acceptable reason why the claims should proceed.

Practical note

Unfair dismissal claims will be struck out where the claimant lacks the qualifying two years' service, even if the claimant is given an opportunity to explain why the claim should proceed.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.108

Case details

Case number
2306615/2024
Decision date
6 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Sector
technology
Represented
No

Employment details

Service
2 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No