Cases6004626/2024

Claimant v Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

5 March 2025Before Employment Judge JM WadeLeedsremote video

Outcome

Claimant succeeds£11,896

Individual claims

Redundancy Paysucceeded

The tribunal found that the offered alternative employment was not objectively suitable because the claimant lacked the essential qualifications and post-qualification training in adult personality disorder required for the senior leadership role. The claimant also had sound and justifiable reasons to refuse the offer, including professional concerns about practising outside his competence, loss of status, and the need for substantial career retraining over an uncertain timeframe. The claimant did not act unreasonably in refusing the post.

Facts

The claimant was a Clinical Lead/Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist (Band 8b) whose service (NCS) was closed by the respondent NHS Trust in 2023. The respondent offered him an alternative post as Principal Clinical/Counselling Psychologist in an adult Personality Disorder service at the same grade and pay, plus one day per week in a CAMHS inpatient unit to maintain his professional registration. The claimant lacked post-qualification training and direct experience in adult personality disorder—an essential criterion for the role—and would require a development plan estimated to take six months to five years to achieve full competence. He refused the offer citing professional concerns about practising outside his competence, loss of status, and complex dual accountability arrangements.

Decision

The tribunal found the offered post was not objectively suitable alternative employment because the claimant lacked essential qualifications and specialist experience required for the senior leadership role in adult personality disorder services. Even if it were suitable, the claimant had sound and justifiable reasons to refuse: he could not in professional conscience accept a role requiring him to lead others in a field where he lacked competence, and the offer represented a loss of status from established specialist to learner. The tribunal awarded the claimant his statutory redundancy payment of £11,895.50.

Practical note

An offer of alternative employment at the same grade and pay may still be objectively unsuitable where it requires a senior professional to work outside their area of expertise and professional competence, particularly where essential qualifications are lacking and significant retraining is required.

Award breakdown

Redundancy pay£11,896

Legal authorities cited

Mrs Readman v Devon Primary Care Trust UKEAT/0116/11/ZTMid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust v Mrs Stevenson and others EA-2022-000591-AS

Statutes

Employment Rights Act 1996 s.141Employment Rights Act 1996 s.135

Case details

Case number
6004626/2024
Decision date
5 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
2
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
healthcare
Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister

Employment details

Role
Clinical Lead/Consultant Child and Adolescent Psychotherapist

Claimant representation

Represented
Yes
Rep type
barrister