Cases102516/2010

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

5 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

The claim was struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d) after the claimant failed to respond to the tribunal's order of 15 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 29 January 2025 or a request for a hearing.

Facts

Mrs F Brown brought a claim against Glasgow City Council. On 15 January 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 29 January 2025 or request a hearing to show cause why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing despite being given the opportunity.

Practical note

Claimants must comply with unless orders and actively pursue their claims, or risk strike-out for non-pursuit even without a hearing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
102516/2010
Decision date
5 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No