Claimant v The Lyndhurst Ale House
Outcome
Individual claims
The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages. The respondent did not participate in the proceedings and judgment was entered in the claimant's favour for £800.
Facts
Mr Meier brought a claim against The Lyndhurst Ale House alleging unauthorised deductions from wages. The respondent did not enter a response or participate in the proceedings. The tribunal determined that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions totalling £800.
Decision
Employment Judge Anstis found in favour of the claimant under Rule 22 (default judgment). The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £800 in respect of the unauthorised deductions from wages.
Practical note
A respondent's failure to participate in proceedings can result in a default judgment being entered against them based on the claimant's allegations.
Award breakdown
Legal authorities cited
Statutes
Case details
- Case number
- 3310728/2024
- Decision date
- 4 March 2025
- Hearing type
- default judgment
- Hearing days
- —
- Classification
- default
Respondent
- Sector
- hospitality
- Represented
- No
Claimant representation
- Represented
- No