Cases4103508/2012

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

4 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Claim struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d) after claimant failed to respond to tribunal's unless order dated 16 January 2025 requiring written reasons by 30 January 2025 or a request for a hearing.

Facts

Mrs Blair brought a claim against Glasgow City Council in 2012. The claim was not actively pursued by the claimant. On 16 January 2025, the tribunal issued an unless order requiring the claimant to provide written reasons by 30 January 2025 or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing following the tribunal's unless order.

Practical note

Employment tribunals will strike out claims for non-pursuit where claimants fail to comply with unless orders, even in long-running cases.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4103508/2012
Decision date
4 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No