Claimant v Elite Academy of Security Training Limited

The tribunal found that the claimant's claim that she suffered detriment in making public interest disclosures was not well founded, meaning the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant made qualifying protected disclosures or that she suffered detriment as a result of such disclosures.

The tribunal found the claimant's claim under the Equality Act 2010 for direct discrimination was not well founded, meaning the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant was treated less favourably because of a protected characteristic.

The tribunal found the claimant's claim for harassment under the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded, meaning the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant was subjected to unwanted conduct related to a protected characteristic that violated her dignity or created an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment.

The tribunal found the claimant's claim for victimisation under the Equality Act 2010 was not well founded, meaning the tribunal was not satisfied that the claimant was subjected to a detriment because she had done a protected act under the Equality Act.

The tribunal found the claimant's claim that she suffered unlawful deduction of wages was well founded. The respondent failed to pay an outstanding contribution of £225 towards the claimant's hotel accommodation, which was wages properly payable to the claimant.