Cases4102543/2019

Claimant v Glasgow City Council

3 March 2025Before Employment Judge F EcclesScotlandon papers

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Otherstruck out

Struck out for non-pursuit under rule 38(1)(d) after claimant failed to give acceptable reasons or request a hearing following tribunal's unless order dated 15 January 2025.

Facts

The claimant brought a claim against Glasgow City Council in 2019. The Tribunal issued an unless order on 15 January 2025 requiring the claimant to provide written reasons or request a hearing to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant failed to comply with this order.

Decision

The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the grounds that the claim had not been actively pursued. The claimant had been given an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out but failed to provide acceptable reasons or request a hearing.

Practical note

Claimants must actively comply with tribunal orders and engage with the process, or risk having their claim struck out for non-pursuit, even years after filing.

Legal authorities cited

Statutes

Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 rule 38(1)(d)

Case details

Case number
4102543/2019
Decision date
3 March 2025
Hearing type
strike out
Hearing days
Classification
procedural

Respondent

Name
Glasgow City Council
Sector
local government
Represented
No

Claimant representation

Represented
No