Cases2601870/2024

Claimant v University of Nottingham

3 March 2025Before Employment Judge M. A SiddiqueNottinghamin person

Outcome

Claimant fails

Individual claims

Redundancy Payfailed

The claimant was paid £13,519.29 under the respondent's enhanced voluntary redundancy scheme based on 12 years' service as an employee from 2007-2020. The tribunal found the claimant was a casual worker, not an employee, between 2000-2007 due to lack of evidence of mutuality of obligation. Even if the claimant had been an employee for 19 years, the statutory redundancy payment under s.162 ERA would only be £9,608.48, less than already paid. The tribunal cannot award more than the statutory calculation.

Facts

The claimant worked as a catering assistant for the University of Nottingham from September 2000, initially as a casual worker, then as an employee from November 2007 until his voluntary redundancy in July 2020. He was paid £13,519.29 under an enhanced redundancy scheme based on 12 years' service as an employee. In December 2020 he disputed this, claiming 19 years' continuous service. He contacted ACAS and the employer in January 2021 but did not issue tribunal proceedings until October 2024. He sought an enhanced redundancy payment reflecting all 19 years.

Decision

The tribunal dismissed the claim. Although the claim was in time under s.164(1)(b) ERA as the claimant challenged the redundancy amount in writing within 6 months, the tribunal found he was a casual worker, not an employee, between 2000-2007 due to lack of evidence of mutuality of obligation. The redundancy payment calculation based on 12 years' service was correct. Even if he had been an employee for 19 years, the statutory redundancy payment would be £9,608.48, less than the £13,519.29 already paid.

Practical note

A tribunal cannot award a statutory redundancy payment exceeding the s.162 ERA calculation, even where an employer has paid an enhanced amount under a voluntary scheme but based on fewer years of service than claimed by the employee.

Legal authorities cited

Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions [1968] 2 QB 497Bentley Engineering Co Ltd v Crown and Miller [1976] ICR 225

Statutes

ERA 1996 s.162ERA 1996 s.164ERA 1996 s.163ERA 1996 s.111ERA 1996 s.230

Case details

Case number
2601870/2024
Decision date
3 March 2025
Hearing type
full merits
Hearing days
1
Classification
contested

Respondent

Sector
education
Represented
Yes
Rep type
in house

Employment details

Role
catering assistant
Service
20 years

Claimant representation

Represented
No